Safety Advocate Notes GOP Presidential Candidate Support For Auto Safety


Safety Advocate Notes GOP Presidential Candidate Support For Auto Safety

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Safety advocate Laura Christian’s Op Ed notes:

“At the GOP presidential debate in Colorado, Gov. Chris Christie looked the audience in the eye and promised them he would have prosecuted GM employees for the incompetence, misconduct and deliberate foot-dragging surrounding the ignition switch defect that led to at least 174 deaths and scores of injuries. He would have sent them to jail.

When will the other candidates, of both parties – and more importantly, politicians who are in office today – have the courage to stand up and say the same thing?”  See:

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/11/kudos_to_christie_for_promising_prosecution_of_gm.html#comments

 

Invitation to a Presentation on Defects


Invitation to a Presentation on Defects

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Please see informative invitation below from Byron Bloch to his forthcoming presentation.YOU ARE INVITED TO A SPECIAL PRESENTATION AT UDC CLARKE SCHOOL OF LAW

This is a special free event open to all – please register at www.law.udc.edu/event/Crash_Safety
Wednesday – November 4th – from 4 to 6 PM    
4340 Connecticut Ave. NW  –  Washington, D.C.
– Auto Safety Defects You Shouldn’t Overlook! 
– How to Identify, Develop, and Present an Auto Defects Case
– Pursuing Justice for the Car Crash Victim You Represent
by Byron Bloch, National Expert in Auto Safety & Crashworthiness

 

Medal of Freedom – Corporate Freedom To Pollute


Medal of Freedom – Corporate Freedom To Pollute

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Yesterday President Obama awarded the Medal of Freedom to William Ruckelshaus.  Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ruckelshaus

Having been fired as a whistle blower under Ruckelshaus, I see it differently.  In 1971, I blew the whistle on EPA for rigging the auto emission standards to allow more pollutants than called for in the Clean Air Act.  See https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/1970-PolutionControlEfforts.php

I did not know it at the time, but the Nixon tapes decades later showed that Lee Iacocca and Henry Ford II in a White House meeting April 27, 1971 Henry Ford II notes that Ruckelshaus might help by the way “he runs his test procedures”.  See https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/assets/Nixon-Transcriptions.pdf
There is little pleasure in knowing I was right and Ruckelshaus was wrong.  Nixon referred to safety advocates and environmentalists as “enemies of the system”.  I  don’t mind being thought of as an enemy of a rigged system. 
Ironic, to say the least, that after decades of Americans suffering the many harmful effects of automotive pollutants including countless deaths and diseases, and in the midst of the current VW emission cheating scandal, President Obama awards Ruckelshaus the Medal of Freedom.
This act by President Obama is one more bit of evidence that the current system is rigged against the people.
Lou

 

Paul Ryan Speaker of….


Paul Ryan Speaker of….

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Will Paul Ryan speak for crash victims?

Over the period 2004 – 2013, in the Congressional District he currently represents, the number of crash deaths amounted to 729 people.  That record averaged more than one crash death per week over a decade in just the District he has “represented” all those years.   His record of crash deaths and that of crash deaths in every representative’s district are publicly available free to all at https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/CrashDeathMappingTools.php

The NY Times Editorial Board wrote about the legislation at the Speaker’s current attention.  The editorial is titled “The Bill That Would Make Roads Less Safe”.  Seehttp://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/04/opinion/the-bill-that-would-make-roads-less-safe.html?ref=opinion&_r=0

We will soon see who Speaker Ryan speaks for.
Lou

 

Despite Polls FOR Safety, Pols Work AGAINST Safety


Despite Polls FOR Safety, Pols Work AGAINST Safety

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:
1.  Crash Victims Work for and Petition for Safety:
A petition was created by Cally Houck, a mother who tragically lost two daughters in a vehicle rented with a fatal defect.  The petition has nearly 200,000 signatures.  See it and sign it athttps://www.change.org/p/rep-fred-upton-repfredupton-support-the-raechel-and-jacqueline-houck-safe-rental-car-act/u/14185894?tk=xVc2ho2_rEqAkesIy2EqfzySNIALRTidGVefwG5roFQ&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email

2.   Polls Show Support FOR Safety:

NEW POLL FINDS AMERICANS ACROSS ALL SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND POLITICAL PARTIES SUPPORT SAFETY POSITIONS ON ISSUES NOW BEFORE CONGRESS

 

>> Support Criminal Penalties for Corporate Auto and Equipment Executives who Cover Up Dangerous Safety Defects

 

>>  Support Car Dealers Being Required to Repair Recalled Used and Loaner Cars Before Consumers Drive Away

>> Oppose Teen Truck and Bus Drivers in Interstate Traffic and

>> Oppose Oversized Double Trailer Trucks on Our Nation’s Roads and Highways

 

Washington, D.C. (November 17, 2015) – Right now, Members of the House and Senate are racing to finish negotiations on a multi-billion dollar six-year surface transportation bill, known as the DRIVE Act (H.R. 22) and the annual spending bill for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)(H.R. 3488). These critically important bills not only will set transportation policies and funding levels for the construction and repair of highways, bridges and transit systems but they will also have a deadly impact on safety if changes are not made. Decisions about how safe or how dangerous our roads and highways will be are being made this week. Even though the bills will be paid for by taxpayers, anti-safety special interests aided by their friends in Congress have succeeded in carving corporate earmarks, industry giveaways and special exemptions from safety rules, all at the expense of public safety. 

Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) commissioned a public opinion poll to gauge public support and opposition for a few of the critical motor vehicle and motor carrier safety issues at stake in the DRIVE Act and transportation appropriations bill. The poll was taken this past weekend and shows very strong levels of public support for safety positions across all categories including age, gender, religion, race, income, education and political party affiliation. Below is a summary of the poll findings. The complete findings of the poll are available at www.saferoads.org.

3.  Some Officials Work AGAINST Safety

“WASHINGTON — Buried deep within a massive transportation bill that passed the House of Representatives is a little-noticed provision that won’t have much effect on highway projects, but is of great interest to automobile dealers.

The provision, an amendment offered just before midnight on Nov. 11, would allow dealers to rent or loan out vehicles even if they are subject to safety recalls. Rental car companies, meanwhile, don’t get the same treatment under the proposed law.

In essence, the amendment would allow an auto dealer to loan you a vehicle under active recall while you are getting your own fixed for the same defect.

The man who offered the amendment is no stranger to car dealerships. In fact, that’s his business. U.S. Rep.Roger Williams, R-Austin, sponsored the amendment. In introducing it on the floor of the House, he noted, “I am a second-generation auto dealer. I have been in the industry most of my life. I know it well.”

The possibility that his action might be considered a conflict of interest was apparently not on his mind, though it certainly occurred to others.”

 

Purposes of Tort Law Missed by Judge in GM Ignition Switch Coverup


Purposes of Tort Law Missed by Judge in GM Ignition Switch Coverup

November, 2015

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Ralph Nader describes three purposes of Tort Law:“the three purposes of tort law. One is to compensate people for their injuries; the second is to disclose facts so the press picks up and publicizes the story alerting people about what to avoid, how to shop, and what their rights are; and the third is deterrence so other companies or other providers or vendors get the idea that maybe it’s better—and cheaper—to be safe than unsafe with your customers.”  Seehttp://parade.com/439904/m-b-roberts/ralph-nader-on-lawsuits-you-never-have-enough-cases/

An Insurance Journal article describes a ruling by Judge Furman as follows:

“General Motors Co. and its law firm need not turn over privileged documents to drivers hoping to show that the automaker intended to commit a crime or fraud by concealing defective ignition switches in their vehicles, a Manhattan federal judge ruled on Nov. 25.

Despite finding “probable cause” to believe GM committed a crime or fraud by hiding the defect from regulators and the public, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman found no showing that the automaker and King & Spalding produced the documents with an intent to further such misconduct.

Most of the documents related to the law firm’s advice from 2010 to 2013 on three crashes involving Chevrolet Cobalts. Vehicle owners said the deception justified a waiver of attorney-client privilege.

“Put simply, plaintiffs do not provide a factual basis for a good faith belief that the communications and work product they seek – let alone any particular communications or work product they seek – were made with the intent to further a crime or fraud,” Furman wrote.”  Seehttp://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2015/11/30/390286.htm

You be the judge.  Did Judge Furman meet the three tests?  Compensation?  Disclosure?  Deterrence?

Who is Judge Furman? 

“Furman’s brother Jason Furman serves as an economic adviser to President Barack Obama.[5]”

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_M._Furman

Should Judge Furman have ruled differently for crash victims past, present, and future?  Will there be more victims?  Less compensation?  Less deterrence?

You be the Jury in the Court of Public Opinion.