Climate Change Leadership From California Officials

Climate Change Leadership From California Officials

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

A NY Times article reports on leadership that set climate change goals.

“LOS ANGELES — California will extend its landmark climate change legislation to 2030, a move that climate specialists say solidifies the state’s role as a leader in the effort to curb heat-trapping emissions.

Lawmakers have passed, and Gov. Jerry Brown has promised to sign, bills requiring the state to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels.”

See  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/26/us/californias-emissions-goal-is-a-milestone-on-climate-efforts.html?mabReward=CTM&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&region=CColumn&module=Recommendation&src=rechp&WT.nav=RecEngine

This story is relevant because it addresses one of the forms of vehicle violence: air pollution emissions.  The story shows that people can get worthy goals set despite corporate opposition.

Long Fight For Clean Air

A story I recall took place California while I was working on the Clean Air Act. In 1969 students from MIT challenged students from CalTech to a Clean Air Car Race during the summer of 1970.  Engineering students from about 40 schools joined in.  My job in the summer of 1970 was to monitor the emission measurements in Boston, then at the Government lab in Ann Arbor MI, and finally at CalTech.   The goal was to see if students could build a car that could meet stringent standards being considered by Sen. Muskie.   At the time President Nixon was afraid that he might have to run against Sen. Muskie in 1972.  So the President tried to preempt Muskie by proposing stringent standards to be met by 1980.  Muskie and the Congress proposed moving up the 1980 standards to 1975 in the Clean Air Act.

The final afternoon of measurements was a high air pollution day in LA.  Someone came over to me and told me were experiencing record smog levels.  I was dubious and asked how he could say that.  He said that in the adjacent parking lot the County had a trailer measuring air pollution levels.  At a break, I decided to go over and see it.  So I jogged across the lot up three steps and could feel a burning in my lungs.  I went into the trailer and there were a few people watching the measurement charts going up and up.  I remarked: Wow that really is a high level.  Just then a man in a three piece suit next to me scowled at me:  “Smog doesn’t bother me one bit!”  I felt the hair on my neck stand up and returned to my tasks.

In the 1970 race a team from Wayne State University put together a Ford Capri with two catalysts.  The vehicle demonstrated the feasibility of meeting the 1975 standards Sen Muskie was proposing in 1970 and we did not have to wait until 1980 as Nixon was proposing. My job was to present the results to a National Academy of Sciences panel of Judges the following morning meeting them at a picnic table.  I knew by face who the Chairman was but not the other judges.  Five of six judges were there.  I showed the results to the Chairman and the other Judges who were present.  All were impressed. Then the Chairman started calling out to someone:  Harry!  Harry!  Over here.  Harry came over and sat down and the Chair told him the results.  Harry tried to get up but the Chairman said Harry, what do you think?  Harry tried to get up again.   And the Chairman put his arm around him and said again “Harry Isn’t this amazing?  What do you think?  Harry did not want to answer and desperately wanted to leave. Who was Harry?  Harry was the man that scowled at me the previous day. He was Harry Barr, VP of Engineering of GM.  See image attached.

Fortunately, I had previously met Sen. Muskie’s aide.  So I called him later and told him what had happened.  The test results were put into the Congressional Record.  The Muskie standards were enacted.

Seehttps://www.careforcrashvictims.com/1970-PolutionControlEfforts.phphttps://www.technologyreview.com/s/517961/a-clean-race/http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/293/1/car.pdfhttps://www.careforcrashvictims.com/assets/20008FX9.PDF

But the auto industry ultimately won by going to Nixon and getting the test methods changed.  I blew the whistle, was fired from EPA a year later, and sued the National Academy of Sciences for access to documents showing that the test procedures were being rigged.  Subsequently, years later, after the Nixon Tapes were released, the information I had been seeking from the NAS became public. The Nixon tapes revealed conversations in the White House with Henry Ford II in 1971 that the emission tests were being rigged (I was right).  The EPA, the Courts, and the NAS were wrong.    The American people were forced to breathe air with higher pollution levels for decades. See https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog/blog-cheatcircle/

The fight for Clean Air continues as does the harm to people breathing polluted air and suffering from climate change effects.

Lou Lombardo

Fwd Advocates Statement on DOT Release of AV Policy

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Joan Claybrook and Advocates have issued the following Press Releases on Public Safety, NHTSA, and Automated Vehicles.

For Immediate Release: September 20, 2016

Contact: Joan Claybrook, 202-422-6731

Statement of Joan Claybrook, former Administrator of NHTSA, on DOT AV Policy Release

 

The Department of Transportation (DOT) must use its federal regulatory authority to assure the American public of the safety of autonomous cars. Safety performance standards encourage competition among automotive companies because they help to assure a market for the real innovators and suppliers. The manufacturers always complain about new federal protections, but autonomous cars are a whole new technology with great promise but also with the potential for serious public harm.

We are pleased that DOT is planning to address these issues and seeking public comment for this new system of transportation but it must not shy away from assuring public safety with minimum federal vehicle safety standards. It should not rely instead on mere guidance, including for the initial elements of automatic vehicle operation such as Automatic Emergency Brakes (AEB) that currently is only guided with a useless industry voluntary standard (it was the key element that failed in the Tesla fatal crashes.)

###

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                   

September 20, 2016

Contact: Allison Kennedy, 202-408-1711

akennedy@saferoads.org

STATEMENT OF JACQUELINE GILLAN,

PRESIDENT OF ADVOCATES FOR HIGHWAY AND AUTO SAFETY,

ON U.S. DOT RELEASE OF FEDERAL AUTOMATED VEHICLES POLICY

 

The U.S. DOT proactive approach to the safe deployment of automated vehicles is a welcomed development.

Yet, policy and legal gaps could result in consumers becoming

“human crash test dummies” in the rush to market.

 

Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates) is pleased to see the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) taking a proactive approach to safety by releasing guidelines for the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs).  The advent of driverless cars holds great promise to advance safety.  However, federal oversight, minimum performance requirements, rigorous testing as well as transparent and verified data are essential in the development process.  Consumers cannot be “human guinea pigs” in this experiment and the federal government cannot be a passive spectator. 

The guidance about future plans released today by the federal government must be considered a first step in the process of ensuring that AVs are safe for the public. While we welcome innovation and the life-saving potential of AVs, we are concerned about life-threatening dangers in a rush to market.  The improvements promised by AVs needs to be framed and encouraged by federal safety standards which DOT has the authority to issue today.  The DOT must ensure that the American public is not used to “beta test” these new technologies. Beta testing, to eliminate program flaws, can be used for computer simulations but not for real world situations impacting life and death.

This announcement should not be seen as an alternative to comprehensive safety standards, thorough oversight and strong enforcement. The promising benefits of AVs are great, but the potential problems are too serious and the public safety risks are too momentous to be left to industry alone. Recent incidents involving the recall of tens of millions of vehicles and needless deaths and injuries due to faulty General Motors’ ignition switches, dangerous Takata airbags and cheating emissions systems in Volkswagen vehicles highlight how the industry easily conceals problems from both the public and the government.  That must also change. Now is the time for Congress to give the DOT and its agencies additional legal authority and enforcement tools that other safety agencies already have.  These include imminent hazard authority to quickly pull dangerous vehicles off the roads, criminal penalties for corporate malfeasance, and pre-market approval of new technologies to ensure public safety.

Advocates strongly urges the DOT to establish and enforce functional safety standards, before consumers even open the car door to AVs.  This is the same approach the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) uses to review and approve new technologies in the aviation industry.  It has served the public well, has guaranteed safety and has not hampered the introduction and deployment of new safety technologies.

The DOT has the responsibility to ensure that motor vehicles do not pose an unreasonable safety risk to the public.  The potential safety benefits that AV systems may provide will only come once they are able to operate safely and without fail under all operating conditions and at all times.  During this transition between old and new, which may take many years, federal agency oversight and involvement are essential to ensuring that public safety doesn’t take a back seat to private enterprise.

###

GM Recall Survivors Working to Save Future Lives

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Laura Christian, mother of a daughter killed in a defective GM vehicle, has launched a Detroit Billboard initiative memorializing the 174 dead – counted so far.

One aim is to organize crash victims into a force for safety.

The Press Release and the Billboard design are attached.

Lou

Is Volkswagen Scandal The Beginning Of A Healthier And Safer World

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Automotive News and Bloomberg reports on the VW scandal indicate that this scandal may be early steps toward a safer and healthier world.  The contributions of auto emissions to early deaths are becoming clearer (53,000 each year in the U.S.A). And the atmospheric damage of automotive emissions to the planet endangering us all is also becoming clearer.Now more people are finally and forcefully acting.

Money

First, Automotive News carried the following Bloomberg (and Reuters) report:

“BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest money manager, is joining a growing list of investors and governments lining up to sue Volkswagen AG almost a year after the German carmaker admitted to duping emissions tests for as many as 11 million diesel cars.

“On behalf of their investors, a number of BlackRock-managed collective investment schemes are pursuing, alongside other institutional investors, legal action against Volkswagen,” BlackRock said Thursday in an e-mailed statement.”

See  http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20160916/COPY01/309169962/vw-being-sued-by-blackrock-as-more-investors-governments-take-legal

Second, Automotive news carried an excellent article on impacts so far on Volkswagen.

SEATTLE — These days, Volkswagen executives talk more about winning back trust than market share.

It has been that way ever since the diesel emissions scandal cast the brand known for happy hippie-mobiles into a basket of deplorables, alongside Enron, Lance Armstrong and Bernie Madoff.

See http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20160918/OEM/309199964

But this is just the beginning. 

Health of Our Citizens and Our Planet

I believe we will find that on road emissions of all vehicles (not just diesels) is much higher than Federal emission tests indicate.

And citizens are now organizing to create a safer and healthier world.  See https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog/blog-50yearsofairpollutionbyvehicles53000earlydeathsperyearinusatoday/

One result of existential threats is action – hopefully in time.

Hope is growing.

Lou Lombardo

____________________Lou Lombardowww.CareForCrashVictims.com

Nader, Auto Hall of Fame, Millions of Lives Saved in Last 50 Years, and Breaking Through Power

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

The Beginning:

Please watch Nader’s talk at his Induction into the Auto Hall of Fame.  He tells us all how it began.See  https://nader.org/
The Results:

And in “Federal Regulation Saves Millions of Lives” he describes the results.  See https://blog.nader.org/2016/09/09/federal-regulation-saves-millions-of-lives/

The Future:

And in his forthcoming Conference on “Breaking Through Power” he will help us look ahead as to how we can advance our “safety and happiness” by restoring our government “of, by, and for the people.”  See https://www.breakingthroughpower.org/

Lou Lombardo

____________________Lou Lombardowww.CareForCrashVictims.com

Nader Conference “Breaking Through Power” on Tort Law

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

With all the wrongdoing that has gone on, and continues to this day, we need to see and hear the people with the experience of righting wrongs.

Who has done more to right more wrongs than Ralph Nader?

Nader is devoting a day of his Conference on “Breaking Through Power” to Tort Law.

He is including Marianne Karth, the mother who lost two daughters in a truck underride crash.  Marianne has worked tirelessly to convert her grief into good so that other Americans need not suffer such tragedies.She has been researching and writing about what happened, its consequences, the historical failures for decades to promulgate solutions, and what can be done to end preventable vehicle violence for all of us – forevermore.  She obtained 20,000 signatures on a petition to President Obama for adoption of a National Vision Zero Goal and delivered them in March 2016.  See http://annaleahmary.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Vision-Zero-Petition-Book-3rd-Edition.pdf

She has taught me to better appreciate the injustice and the inequality of corporate and Federal government policies of weighing people’s lives against corporate dollars.

Attend this Conference and help us all learn how we can advance justice and reduce inequality.  See  http://eepurl.com/cfM1ib
Lou Lombardo

____________________Lou Lombardowww.CareForCrashVictims.com

Nader Release on Celebration – With Purpose – of 50th Anniversary of Safety Laws

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Please see attached Release

For More Information or to arrange interviews with Ralph Nader

Contact: Hunter Jones or Todd Main

202-387-8034

info@csrl.org

The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Acts – Fiftieth Anniversary (1966-2016)

 Nader Holds Four-Day Conference to Commemorate Fiftieth Anniversary Year of

the Publication of Unsafe at Any Speed

Today, September 9, 2016, marks the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson’s signing of the National Highway Traffic Safety Act, a result of Ralph Nader’s landmark book Unsafe at Any Speed, which was published the previous yearThe book opened with the faulty rear suspension system of the General Motors Corvair, This defect could cause the Corvair to skid violently and roll over. The corporate negligence that had produced the various Corvair defects, Nader said, was “one of the greatest acts of industrial irresponsibility.” More broadly, Unsafe at Any Speed documented how Detroit habitually subordinated safety to style and marketing concerns. The main cause of automobile occupant injuries, Nader demonstrated, was not the “nut behind the wheel” so often blamed by the auto industry, but the inherent engineering and design deficiencies of motor vehicles that were woefully unsafe, especially in terms of “crashworthiness”—no seat belts, etc.

At the signing, President Johnson said, “I am proud of the 89th Congress, which took my proposals and brought forth these laws. And I’m proud at this moment to sign these bills—which promise, in the years to come, to cure the highway disease, to end the years of horror and give us hope.”

See full copy attached.

Lou Lombardo