Defective Vehicle Seats Allowed By NHTSA To Kill and Maim for Decades

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Fair Warning editor Myron Levin has published an excellent article that cites several crash victim tragedies.  The article notes:

“For decades, safety regulators and the auto industry have known that many seats can fail in moderate- to high-speed rear-end crashes. When the seat collapses, the driver or front seat passenger can slide rearward out of the seat belt and be launched headfirst into the backseat, badly injuring a backseat passenger or being paralyzed or killed himself.

Since the 1990s, automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have instructed parents to put young children in the backseat to avoid injury from an inflating airbag. But critics say they have failed to provide another crucial piece of information: Due to the risk of seat failure in a rear collision, the safest place for a child is behind an unoccupied seat, or else behind the lightest person in the front.

NHTSA officials “are the safety experts,” said Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, a nonprofit watchdog group. “They know the seatbacks have been collapsing for years. They know that if you put a kid behind an occupied seat, you’ve got a problem. And they’ve never shared that expertise with the public.’’

On March 9 the center filed a petition urging NHTSA to modify its child seating recommendations, and to require automakers to state in owner’s manuals that, whenever possible, children should sit behind an empty front seat or behind the lightest person. Such warnings are essential, the petition said, because of NHTSA’s decades-long failure to require sturdier seats that perform better in rear crashes. In a letter to NHTSA Administrator Mark R. Rosekind, the group also urged the agency to act favorably on a separate petition, filed last September, to upgrade its seatback standard. It’s uncertain when NHTSA will act on the petitions.

Adopted in 1967, the federal seat standard is nearly a half-century old. To support their view that the standard is a joke, safety engineers have run tests showing that lawn and banquet chairs, and even cardboard seats, are sturdy enough to meet the strength requirements. NHTSA officials themselves have repeatedly acknowledged that the standard is outdated, but say their hands are tied.”  See http://www.fairwarning.org/2016/03/flawed-seats/#sthash.kQ9Sx4gm.dpuf

and https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog/blog-seatbackfailuresresponsibility/

For who has tied NHTSA’s hands and how see  https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog-lastdecade.php

And http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/29/opinion/weak-oversight-deadly-cars.html

Freeing NHTSA to do its job requires changes – for the better – all the way up to the White House.  And the Congress.  And the Courts.

Lou

 

Senators Blumenthal and Markey Urge NHTSA Action Now


Senators Blumenthal and Markey Urge NHTSA Action Now

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

cid:image002.png@01D08CC6.9E16EC20

 

 

For Immediate Release:March 17, 2016
Contact: Josh Zembik (Blumenthal) – 202-224-6452 Giselle Barry (Markey) – 202-224-2742

 

BLUMENTHAL, MARKEY TO NHTSA: CONSUMERS CAN’T WAIT UNTIL 2022 FOR LIFESAVING BRAKING TECHNOLOGY

(Washington, D.C.) – U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.) issued the following statement in response to an announcement today by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) and Insurance Institute for Highway Safety that 20 automakers have committed to make automatic emergency braking standard on all new cars by 2022.  

“NHTSA is apparently content braking at the very last second for safety by allowing manufacturers to wait until 2022 to install lifesaving technology that has already been proven to save lives. This safety technology, which could prevent or reduce the consequences of an estimated 80 percent of rear-end collisions, can and needs to be in the car of today, not the car of tomorrow. Today’s announcement by DOT and IIHS adds little to improve safety beyond the status quo, and simply demonstrates the continued culture of informality between automakers and regulators that has led to thousands of deaths. Furthermore, as a voluntary agreement, it holds no force. We urge NHTSA to make automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning technologies standard and mandatory in all new vehicles and will seek measures to ensure these lifesaving technologies are available to all drivers sooner.”

 

Petition: Children Killed and Maimed for Life for Decades While NHTSA Failed to Protect or Warn


Petition: Children Killed and Maimed for Life for Decades While NHTSA Failed to Protect or Warn

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Today the Center for Auto Safety had to petition the NHTSA to do its job and protect children.

This Petition will upset members of the public as it documents a tragic history of NHTSA failures to protect children or even properly warn parents with disastrous consequences.

Please see https://www.autosafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Seat-Back-Petition-FINAL.pdf

Lou

 

Citizens Doing Safety Research That NHTSA + FHWA + DOT Should Have Been Doing For Decades


Citizens Doing Safety Research That NHTSA + FHWA + DOT Should Have Been Doing For Decades

March, 2016

Dear Care For Crash Victims Community Members:

Please see post by Marianne Karth on research that DOT should support – immediately.  http://annaleahmary.com/2016/03/witnessed-safety-defect-in-action-at-underride-crash-tests-this-is-what-snuffed-out-my-daughters-lives/ President Obama, Secretary Foxx, NHTSA Administrator Rosekind, and FHWA Administrator Nadeau (see his background at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/about/org/admin.cfm   ) owe this to the American people’s future safety!  

Having served in the Secretary’s office and put on a Technology Fair on the Mall in the 1990s, I know they can do this.  They could even display the crashed vehicles and truck guards at DOT or on the Mall in front of the Capitol.
Let’s ask them to do their jobs.  Now!
Lou

 

Roadside Memorials – Messages That NHTSA Won’t Send


Roadside Memorials – Messages That NHTSA Won’t Send

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Roadside Memorials convey information that NHTSA’s data won’t.  Relationships.  Signs of love and loss.  Evidence of human pain and suffering that are lost in NHTSA’s dry data.   I have always thought of NHTSA’s statistics as being devoid of human emotions and human consequences.

NHTSA does not count: *  the children orphaned

*  the broken families and members left behind and bereft

*  the grandparents and grandchildren

*  the unborn 

*  the people who die of their injuries after 30 days of the crash

* the people who die of injuries sustained off public roads (parking lots, driveways, etc. categorized by NHTSA as NITS)  See http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/042015.pdf 

From data to statistics to information to knowledge to action.  The purpose of collecting data is to result in actions to end the tragedies.
Yet we have seen how NHTSA has failed to protect us for decades.  
It has taken citizens telling their stories to build enough political power to force governmental change – for the better.
Some examples:
*  Cally Houck’s story Death by Rental Car.  See https://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog/blog-safetyvictory11/
*  Janette Fennell who founded KidsandCars.org.  See http://www.kidsandcars.org/ and http://conta.cc/24deY6W
*  Marianne Karth family who collected 20,000 signatures for a Vision Zero Petition. Seehttp://www.thepetitionsite.com/417/742/234/save-lives-not-dollars-urge-dot-to-adopt-vision-zero-policy/
Imagine if the families of the 3,686,139 people who have lost their lives in vehicular violence told their stories or put up a roadside memorial.  Seehttps://www.careforcrashvictims.com/clock.php
We could get a Vision Zero Goal for an end to crash deaths and serious injuries in or by a new vehicle – in a decade – a reasonable goal already adopted by Volvo and others.  Yes we can!
 
Lou

 

Consumer Groups Ask DOT & NHTSA for Public Participation in Autonomous Driving Policy Development


Consumer Groups Ask DOT & NHTSA for Public Participation in Autonomous Driving Policy Development

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:

Joan Claybrook, the Center for Auto Safety’s Clarence Ditlow, Consumers For Auto Reliability and Safety’s Rosemary Shahan, Consumer Watchdog’s John M. Simpson, and Consumers Union’s William C. Wallace have signed a letter to the current DOT Secretary Anthony Foxx and the current NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind for public participation in safety policy development.  See attached letter.

Keep in mind that current DOT and NHTSA officials may soon go through the DOT/NHTSA Revolving Door as did so many other “public servants” to become corporate servants. Just one example, former NHTSA Deputy Administrator Ron Medford under George W. Bush went on to work for Google.  Seehttps://www.careforcrashvictims.com/blog-nhtsacorpservants.php

Is it any wonder fatalities are rising from the current rate of nearly 100 crash deaths per day — and 400 serious injuries per day + losses valued by DOT policy at an estimated $2 Billion per day.

The main stream media so far has not paid enough attention to such tragic losses every day in the U.S.A. today and why we have not as a nation done better protecting the American people here at home.

Lou

 

Safety Victory – After 11 Year Struggle


Safety Victory – After 11 Year Struggle

March, 2016

Dear Care for Crash Victims Community Members:
On “October 7, 2004, two Houck sisters were killed in “a Chrysler PT Cruiser rented from Enterprise Rent-A-Car, that had been recalled for a safety defect that could cause an engine fire, but the corporation had failed to repair it.”
On December 4, 2015, the Raechel and Jacqueline Houck Safe Rental Car Act was signed into law.
This is an important story.  More important to Americans than the coverage of most of what is seen on TV and in the papers.  The NY Times covered some of the battles, but not the victory yet as far as my search could find.  See http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/09/business/recalled-used-cars-roam-the-roads-as-federal-legislation-stalls.html?_r=0
Reasons Why This Is An Important Book
*  The inequality of power of people vs. corporate and governmental power and money has never been greater. *  Safety victories are too rare in the U.S.A. today.
*  The American people need to know that safety advances can be made with persistence plus political and community support.

See the press release below by one of my safety heroes Ben Kelley, about the struggles, on our behalf, of Carol Houck and her family.

Immediate Release – See Bottom For Contact, Author Information
Inline image
   

New Book Gives Gripping Account
Of Eleven-Year Legal Saga Triggered
By Sisters’ Defective Rental Car Deaths 

 
Monterey, CA –When the Houck sisters were killed in a fiery head-on collision late one afternoon in October 2004, California state police blamed it on Raechel Houck, 24, the driver. She had made an “unsafe turning maneuver,” they said. “It’s a very rural stretch and people can fall asleep or lose control easily or not pay attention.” 
But in reality, a defective Chrysler PT Cruiser and a huge rental car company’s callous indifference to customer safety caused the tragedy. Even though Enterprise Rent-A-Car had been notified more than a month earlier that the PT Cruiser was under recall, it rented the vehicle to the young women without fixing its lethal defect – a flaw in the power steering hose that allowed flammable power brake fluid to leak onto hot engine surfaces and burst into flames.  

The Houck sisters’ violent deaths were the start of an incredible eleven-year saga that culminated in the congressional passage last December of a landmark law, the Raechel and Jacqueline Houck Safe Rental Car Act of 2015, banning rental car companies from keeping recalled vehicles in service without fixing their defects. A new book, “Death by Rental Car: How The Houck Case Changed The Law,” by Ben Kelley, documents that saga in spellbinding detail. A “real-life courtroom thriller” that “reads like a suspense novel,” reviewers wrote.
In a foreword to “Death By Rental Car,” Ralph Nader calls it a “compelling story of corporate eva­sion and duplicity” and the “dedicated, persistent personal injury attorneys” who fought for the Houcks in their lawsuit against the giant rental car corporation – and ultimately won. The Houcks “saw beyond their own personal tragedy” when they pursued their lawsuit, Nader writes; it was a way to “advance the public’s right to know what both Chrysler and Enterprise Rental wanted kept secret. Drivers and passengers on the roads were in danger.”
“Death by Rental Car” gives a blow-by-blow account of Houck v. Enterprise, the parents’ hard-fought lawsuit against Enterprise. Drawing from the testimony of experts and witnesses in the lawsuit, the book takes the reader inside the litigation, in which the rental car corporation, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, aggressively attempted to blame Raechel Houck for causing the crash.  But what caused the crash was the defect, which triggered an engine compartment fire. Smoke penetrated the passenger compartment, frightening Raechel and causing her to veer off the road and into the path of an oncoming tractor-trailer.
Challenging Enterprise’s campaign to shirk blame for the crash were two lawyers, Larry Grassini and Roland Wrinkle, who represented the Houck parents. They resolutely fought back against Enterprise’s “blame the victim” legal tactics and secrecy strategy and brought the case to a successful conclusion. When Enterprise tried to settle the case by paying the parents a few million dollars in return for their agreement to hide the facts of the crash and Enterprise’s role in causing it, they joined the Houcks in rejecting the offer. Grassini said he was “inspired by the bravery” of the Houck parents, who “refused to take any amount of money in exchange for muzzling them from exposing Enterprise’s business practice of renting recalled cars.”
After the trial in Houck v. Enterprise, the sisters’ mother, Carol “Cally” Houck, embarked on a crusade to win passage of new laws to forbid rental car companies from keeping recalled vehicles in service without first repairing them. Her criterion for an effective law was simple: “If it would have saved my daughters, it’s a good law. If it wouldn’t have, it’s no use.” Her effort, supported by leading safety advocacy groups in California and Washington, led to passage in December of the Raechel and Jacqueline Houck Safe Rental Car Act
“Death By Rental Car” is available from Amazon.com in print and Kindle formats at this link. The book’s Table of Contents is below.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Ben Kelley is a nationally renowned expert on auto safety issues. The Los Angeles Times called him a“pioneer in vehicle safety research.” His commentaries have appeared in newspapers throughout the country and are featured on the www.Fairwarning.org consumer information website. His biography and bibliography are atwww.producthazardconsulting.com.
CONTACTS: For information about the book or to obtain review copies, please contactben.kelley@yahoo.com, or phone him at (831) 920 2460. To contact or arrange interviews with Carol Houck or Larry Grassini, please use the following email addresses and phone numbers: Carol Houck,spendard@juno.com(805) 479 2545; Larry Grassini, lpgrassini@gmail.com.      (818) 348 1717

I recommend our community buy this excellent and important book, read it, and be both educated and inspired by it.

Lou